ring: be in alaska

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, apparatus
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wedding ring
Weight: 0.83
, ring finger
Weight: 0.70
, pyridine
Weight: 0.49
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in alaska 1.00
be made in california 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ring, be in alaska)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ring, be made in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ring, be made in california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ring, be made in california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ring, be made in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring, be in alaska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ring, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ring, be in alaska)