ring: have earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, apparatus
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wedding ring
Weight: 0.83
, ring finger
Weight: 0.70
, pyridine
Weight: 0.49
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earthquakes 1.00
be prone to earthquakes 0.93
have tsunamis volcanoes 0.87
be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ring, have earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ring, have earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ring, have earthquakes)