ripple: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, tool
Weight: 0.47
, effect
Weight: 0.47
Siblings buzz
Weight: 0.30
, hiccup
Weight: 0.30
, big bang
Weight: 0.30
, cry
Weight: 0.30
, electric shock
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
be different price on binance 0.90
fall in price 0.87
go up in price 0.87
drop in price 0.86
has quality good 0.80
have value 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
increase in value 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality price)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality price)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cry, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ripple, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cry, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cry, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hiccup, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ripple, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ripple, be different price on binance)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ripple, be different price on binance)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ripple, be different price on binance)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ripple, go up in price)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ripple, go up in price)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ripple, go up in price)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ripple, be different price on binance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ripple, go up in price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(ripple, drop in price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ripple, drop in price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ripple, drop in price)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ripple, fall in price)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ripple, fall in price)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ripple, drop in price)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ripple, fall in price)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ripple, have value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ripple, fall in price)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ripple, increase in value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(ripple, increase in value)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ripple, have value)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ripple, increase in value)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ripple, increase in value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ripple, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ripple, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ripple, have value)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ripple, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ripple, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ripple, have value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ripple, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cry, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hiccup, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(ripple, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)