rise: be in housing prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents effect
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fall
Weight: 0.63
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, decrease
Weight: 0.33
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, growth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in housing prices 1.00
be with price 0.77
be in inflation 0.76
be in inflation good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(rise, be in housing prices)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(rise, be with price)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rise, be with price)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in inflation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(rise, be with price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rise, be in inflation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in inflation good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rise, be in inflation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rise, be in inflation good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rise, be in inflation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rise, be in inflation good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rise, be with price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(rise, be in inflation good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in housing prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rise, be in housing prices)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rise, be in housing prices)