risk: minimise bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.67
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
, attribute
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings high blood pressure
Weight: 0.71
, drug use
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.63
, obesity
Weight: 0.62
, interest
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
minimise bad thing 1.00
minimise thing 0.93
take bad 0.80
has quality bad 0.78
be problem in world 0.75
happen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(obesity, happen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, happen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, happen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, happen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(obesity, happen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(obesity, happen)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(high blood pressure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(risk, minimise thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(risk, minimise thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(risk, take bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(risk, take bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(risk, minimise thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(risk, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(poverty, happen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(obesity, happen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)