river: be at valley

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, road
Weight: 0.63
, valley
Weight: 0.62
, human waste
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at valley 1.00
be at river valley 0.94
run through valley 0.92
course through valley 0.91
be used to cross valley 0.90
be at canyon 0.80
be at mountainous area 0.80
be at mountainous region 0.79
be at town over river 0.79
be build across water or canyon 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bridge, be build across water or canyon)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creek, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bridge, be at river valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bridge, be used to cross valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bridge, be at town over river)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(creek, be at valley)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bridge, be at river valley)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bridge, be used to cross valley)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bridge, be at town over river)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bridge, be build across water or canyon)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(creek, be at valley)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be at river valley)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be used to cross valley)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be at town over river)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be build across water or canyon)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(road, be at valley)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creek, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bridge, be at river valley)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bridge, be used to cross valley)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bridge, be build across water or canyon)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bridge, be at town over river)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(river, be at valley)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(road, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(road, be at valley)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous area)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(valley, be at mountainous region)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(valley, be at mountainous region)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(river, be at valley)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(river, course through valley)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(river, run through valley)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(river, run through valley)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(river, run through valley)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(river, course through valley)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(river, be at canyon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(river, be at canyon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, run through valley)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(river, be at canyon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(river, be at mountainous area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(river, course through valley)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(river, be at mountainous area)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(river, be at mountainous area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(river, be at canyon)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(river, course through valley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be at valley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(creek, be at valley)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bridge, be at river valley)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to cross valley)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bridge, be build across water or canyon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bridge, be at town over river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(road, be at valley)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(valley, be at mountainous region)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(creek, be at valley)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bridge, be at river valley)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to cross valley)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bridge, be build across water or canyon)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be at valley)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bridge, be at town over river)