river: course through landscape

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, road
Weight: 0.63
, valley
Weight: 0.62
, human waste
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
course through landscape 1.00
course through field 0.84
course through rapidly 0.82
course through valley 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(river, course through landscape)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(river, course through field)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(river, course through field)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(river, course through valley)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(river, course through field)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(river, course through rapidly)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(river, course through valley)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(river, course through rapidly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(river, course through field)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(river, course through rapidly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(river, course through rapidly)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(river, course through valley)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(river, course through valley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(river, course through landscape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(river, course through landscape)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(river, course through landscape)