roast: be higher in caffeine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.58
, meal
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, stew
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in caffeine 1.00
have less caffeine 0.96
have more caffeine 0.96
have caffeine 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(roast, be higher in caffeine)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(roast, have less caffeine)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(roast, have less caffeine)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(roast, have less caffeine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(roast, have more caffeine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(roast, have more caffeine)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(roast, have caffeine)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(roast, have more caffeine)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(roast, have caffeine)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(roast, have caffeine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(roast, have less caffeine)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(roast, have caffeine)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(roast, have more caffeine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(roast, be higher in caffeine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roast, be higher in caffeine)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(roast, be higher in caffeine)