roast: be tied with string

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.58
, meal
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, stew
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tied with string 1.00
is tied 0.89
be wrapped in string 0.88
have string on them 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(roast, be tied with string)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(roast, be wrapped in string)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(roast, be wrapped in string)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(roast, be wrapped in string)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(roast, be wrapped in string)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(roast, have string on them)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(roast, is tied)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(roast, have string on them)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(roast, have string on them)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(roast, is tied)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(roast, is tied)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roast, is tied)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(roast, have string on them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(roast, be tied with string)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(roast, be tied with string)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(roast, be tied with string)