roast: taste spoil

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.58
, meal
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, stew
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste spoil 1.00
taste good 0.85
has taste 0.83
taste salty 0.80
taste good with salt 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(food, has taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(roast, taste spoil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(food, has taste)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(food, has taste)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(food, has taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(roast, taste spoil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(steak, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(roast, taste spoil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(roast, taste spoil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(roast, taste spoil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(food, has taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(roast, taste spoil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(food, has taste)