robert: was famous menzies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.59
, author
Weight: 0.57
, player
Weight: 0.57
Siblings robert frost
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was laselle famous 1.00
was stroud famous 1.00
was famous menzies 1.00
was hooke famous 1.00
was famous 1.00
was elee famous 1.00
is famous 0.96
is niro famous 0.96
be famous goddard 0.95
be famous peary 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(robert frost, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(robert frost, is famous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(robert frost, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(robert, was famous menzies)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(robert, was elee famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(robert, was laselle famous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(robert, was hooke famous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(robert, be famous goddard)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(robert, is famous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(robert, was elee famous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(robert, was elee famous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(robert, was elee famous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(robert, was laselle famous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(robert, was laselle famous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(robert, was laselle famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(robert, be famous goddard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(robert, was hooke famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(robert, be famous goddard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(robert, be famous goddard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(robert, is famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(robert, was hooke famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(robert, was hooke famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(robert, is famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(robert, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(robert, was famous menzies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(robert, was famous menzies)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(robert frost, is famous)