robot: be metallic in color

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, gyroscope
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be metallic in color 1.00
be color 0.87
has metal skin 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be color)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(robot, be metallic in color)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(toy, be color)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(toy, be color)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(toy, be color)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(robot, be metallic in color)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(robot, be metallic in color)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(robot, has metal skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(robot, has metal skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(robot, has metal skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(robot, has metal skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(robot, be metallic in color)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(robot, be metallic in color)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toy, be color)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(robot, be metallic in color)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toy, be color)