robot: be useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bender
Weight: 0.57
, sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful 1.00
is useful 0.99
be useful to people 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(robot, be useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(robot, be useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(robot, be useful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(robot, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(robot, be useful)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(robot, is useful)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(robot, be useful to people)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(robot, is useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(robot, is useful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(robot, is useful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(robot, be useful to people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(robot, be useful to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(robot, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(robot, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)