robot: is cool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bender
Weight: 0.57
, sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cool 1.00
be considered cool 0.92
stay cool 0.90
get hot 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(robot, is cool)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(robot, is cool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(device, get hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(robot, is cool)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(robot, is cool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(robot, is cool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(robot, is cool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(robot, is cool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(robot, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)