rochester: be bigger than syracuse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, community
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york
Weight: 0.35
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, albany
Weight: 0.34
, lexington
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bigger than syracuse 1.00
be bigger than buffalo 0.80
be better than brandeis 0.79
be better than wakefield 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rochester, be better than brandeis)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rochester, be better than wakefield)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rochester, be bigger than buffalo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rochester, be bigger than buffalo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rochester, be better than brandeis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rochester, be bigger than buffalo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(rochester, be better than brandeis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rochester, be bigger than buffalo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rochester, be better than wakefield)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rochester, be better than brandeis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rochester, be better than wakefield)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rochester, be better than wakefield)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rochester, be bigger than syracuse)