rochester: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, community
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york
Weight: 0.35
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, albany
Weight: 0.34
, lexington
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rochester, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rochester, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york city, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(city, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is popular)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(city, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(venice, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rochester, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(new york city, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rochester, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york, is popular)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new york, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(venice, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(venice, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rochester, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rochester, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new york city, is popular)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(new york, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(venice, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new york city, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rochester, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is popular)