rock star: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.70
, celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, young people
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.70
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.68
, elvis costello
Weight: 0.66
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.65
, paul simon
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(musician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rock star, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rock star, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(musician, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(musician, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(musician, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rock star, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rock star, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rock star, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rock star, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(musician, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(musician, get paid)