rock star: has alot of female fan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.70
, celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.68
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.65
, bono
Weight: 0.61
, movie star
Weight: 0.38
, rock
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has alot of female fan 1.00
has person who adore them call fan 0.84
meet fan 0.83
wave to her fan 0.83
be associate with fan 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(celebrity, meet fan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with fan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(star, has person who adore them call fan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(star, has person who adore them call fan)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be associate with fan)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(celebrity, meet fan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(star, has person who adore them call fan)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, meet fan)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be associate with fan)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wave to her fan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(star, has person who adore them call fan)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(celebrity, meet fan)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with fan)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(movie star, wave to her fan)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(movie star, wave to her fan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(rock star, has alot of female fan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(celebrity, meet fan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with fan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(star, has person who adore them call fan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(movie star, wave to her fan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(celebrity, meet fan)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with fan)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rock star, has alot of female fan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(star, has person who adore them call fan)