rock star: is skinny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.70
, celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, young people
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.70
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.68
, elvis costello
Weight: 0.66
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.65
, paul simon
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is skinny 1.00
wear skinny jeans 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(celebrity, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rock star, is skinny)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is skinny)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is skinny)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(celebrity, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rock star, is skinny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(rock star, is skinny)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rock star, wear skinny jeans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rock star, is skinny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rock star, is skinny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(celebrity, is skinny)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rock star, is skinny)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(celebrity, is skinny)