rock star: wear indoors sunglasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.70
, celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, young people
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.70
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.68
, elvis costello
Weight: 0.66
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.65
, paul simon
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear indoors sunglasses 1.00
wear sunglasses 0.91
wear jeans 0.80
wear black 0.78
wear skinny jeans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(musician, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musician, wear black)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(musician, wear sunglasses)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musician, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear sunglasses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(musician, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musician, wear black)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rock star, wear sunglasses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rock star, wear jeans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rock star, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear sunglasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear jeans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear sunglasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear jeans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear black)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear skinny jeans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rock star, wear sunglasses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rock star, wear jeans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rock star, wear black)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rock star, wear skinny jeans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear sunglasses)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear sunglasses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rock star, wear indoors sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(musician, wear black)