rock: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.66
, show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.63
, legend
Weight: 0.62
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.67
, muddy waters
Weight: 0.64
, beatles
Weight: 0.62
, billy joel
Weight: 0.61
, rock star
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00
move in desert 0.95
be abiotic factors of desert 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(rock, be in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(rock, move in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rock, move in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rock, move in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rock, move in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rock, be abiotic factors of desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rock, be abiotic factors of desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rock, be abiotic factors of desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rock, be abiotic factors of desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rock, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rock, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rock, be in desert)