rocky: be good year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.54
, cartoon
Weight: 0.54
, dog
Weight: 0.52
Siblings star trek
Weight: 0.31
, new moon
Weight: 0.30
, bad
Weight: 0.30
, smooth
Weight: 0.30
, dark
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good year 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rocky, be good year)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rocky, be good year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(star trek, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rocky, be good year)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rocky, be good year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(bad, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(star trek, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(star trek, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rocky, be good year)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rocky, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rocky, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rocky, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rocky, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rocky, be good year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(star trek, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rocky, be good year)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)