rodent: chew cables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
chew cables 1.00
chew wires 0.90
chew on wires 0.90
chew electrical wires 0.88
chew car wires 0.87
chew on car wires 0.87
chew 0.83
eat wires 0.82
need chew 0.82
eat car wires 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chew)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(beaver, chew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beaver, chew)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rodent, chew cables)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew car wires)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rodent, chew car wires)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew car wires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat wires)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rodent, eat wires)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat wires)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(rodent, chew car wires)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat car wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(rodent, eat car wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat car wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rodent, chew wires)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew wires)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rodent, eat car wires)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew wires)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew on wires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, chew wires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rodent, chew on wires)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew on wires)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rodent, chew on wires)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rodent, need chew)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(rodent, need chew)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rodent, chew)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rodent, need chew)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rodent, need chew)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew cables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rodent, chew cables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew cables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(beaver, chew)