roger: have expensive plans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.63
, book
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.57
, player
Weight: 0.57
, name
Weight: 0.56
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.35
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have expensive plans 1.00
have plans 0.94
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(book, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(roger, have expensive plans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(book, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(book, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(book, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(roger, have expensive plans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(roger, have expensive plans)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(roger, have plans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(roger, have plans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roger, have plans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(roger, have plans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(roger, have expensive plans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(roger, have expensive plans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(book, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(roger, have expensive plans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(book, is expensive)