rolling: be for babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.57
, hit
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.52
Siblings spinning
Weight: 0.32
, jumping
Weight: 0.32
, grinding
Weight: 0.32
, swing
Weight: 0.32
, slide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for babies 1.00
be good for babies 0.96
be bad for babies 0.96
during pregnancy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(swing, be bad for babies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(swing, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(jumping, during pregnancy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(swing, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(swing, be bad for babies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(swing, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(swing, be good for babies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(jumping, during pregnancy)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(jumping, during pregnancy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rolling, be for babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rolling, be for babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(swing, be bad for babies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(swing, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be for babies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(jumping, during pregnancy)