rom: is non volatile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non volatile 1.00
is volatile 0.95
be called non volatile memory 0.92
be called volatile memory 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rom, is non volatile)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rom, be called non volatile memory)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(rom, be called non volatile memory)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(rom, be called non volatile memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rom, be called volatile memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(rom, be called volatile memory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rom, be called volatile memory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rom, be called non volatile memory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rom, be called volatile memory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rom, is volatile)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rom, is volatile)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rom, is volatile)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rom, is volatile)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rom, is non volatile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(rom, is non volatile)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rom, is non volatile)