roman: were different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.51
, script
Weight: 0.51
, language
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.34
, english language
Weight: 0.32
, chinese language
Weight: 0.32
, hungarian
Weight: 0.32
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different 1.00
was scipio different 0.93
have different easters 0.92
be different 0.92
is different 0.90
was scipio different from hannibal 0.90
were similar 0.89
were same 0.88
was general scipio different from hannibal 0.81
was general scipio different 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(language, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(language, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(language, be different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(language, is different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thing, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, be different)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, be different)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, is different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hungarian, is different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roman, were different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(thing, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roman, were different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(language, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roman, were different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(language, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roman, were different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chinese language, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hungarian, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hungarian, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(roman, were different)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(roman, be different)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(roman, were similar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(roman, be different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(roman, were same)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(roman, were similar)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(roman, be different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(roman, were same)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, be different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(roman, were similar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, were same)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(roman, were similar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(language, is different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(language, be different)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(thing, is different)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chinese language, is different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hungarian, is different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(language, is different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(language, be different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(roman, were different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(thing, is different)