roman: were same

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.51
, script
Weight: 0.51
, language
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.34
, english language
Weight: 0.32
, chinese language
Weight: 0.32
, hungarian
Weight: 0.32
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were same 1.00
were different 0.88
were similar 0.87
was scipio different 0.83
was scipio different from hannibal 0.82
have different easters 0.78
was general scipio different from hannibal 0.77
be different 0.76
be similar 0.76
was general scipio different 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, were same)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(language, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, were same)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(language, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thing, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, be different)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hungarian, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(thing, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(roman, were same)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(language, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(roman, were same)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hungarian, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hungarian, be similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(roman, were same)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(roman, were different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(roman, were similar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roman, were different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(roman, were different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(roman, were similar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(roman, were similar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(roman, were similar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(roman, were different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, be different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(roman, be similar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(roman, be similar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(roman, be similar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(roman, be different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(roman, be different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(roman, was general scipio different from hannibal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(roman, be different)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(roman, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(roman, were same)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(language, be different)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hungarian, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(language, be different)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(roman, were same) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(thing, be different)