rome: was ideal location for city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.63
, republic
Weight: 0.60
, village
Weight: 0.58
Siblings egypt
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.33
, roman republic
Weight: 0.33
, roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, islam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was ideal location for city 1.00
was good site for city 0.83
is important city 0.79
was like city 0.79
was like city of mohenjo-daro 0.79
was city 0.77
was called city 0.77
is city 0.76
be called city 0.76
be considered city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rome, was ideal location for city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rome, was good site for city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rome, was good site for city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rome, was good site for city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rome, was like city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rome, was like city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rome, was city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rome, was city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rome, was called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rome, was called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rome, was like city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rome, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rome, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rome, be called city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rome, be considered city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rome, be called city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rome, be considered city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rome, was city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rome, was called city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rome, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rome, be called city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rome, be considered city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rome, was good site for city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rome, be considered city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rome, was like city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rome, was called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rome, be called city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rome, was city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rome, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rome, was ideal location for city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rome, was ideal location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rome, was ideal location for city)