romeo: was in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lover
Weight: 0.60
, tale
Weight: 0.60
, romance
Weight: 0.58
, story
Weight: 0.58
, play
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fairy tale
Weight: 0.34
, jonah
Weight: 0.33
, jules verne
Weight: 0.33
, charlie
Weight: 0.32
, husband
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in love 1.00
feel in love 0.91
has state love 0.89
resemble love 0.77
was play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(romeo, was in love)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(romeo, feel in love)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(romeo, has state love)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(romeo, feel in love)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(romeo, has state love)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(romeo, feel in love)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(romeo, has state love)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(romeo, was play)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(romeo, resemble love)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(romeo, was play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(romeo, feel in love)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(romeo, was play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(romeo, resemble love)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(romeo, has state love)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(romeo, resemble love)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(romeo, was play)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(romeo, resemble love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(romeo, was in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(romeo, was in love)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(romeo, was in love)