rook: be better than bishops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.60
, chess piece
Weight: 0.46
, card
Weight: 0.46
, piece
Weight: 0.45
, bird
Weight: 0.43
Siblings black knight
Weight: 0.32
, pawn
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bishops 1.00
be more valuable than bishops 0.96
be better than bishop 0.91
be more powerful than bishop 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rook, be better than bishops)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rook, be more valuable than bishops)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rook, be better than bishop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rook, be more valuable than bishops)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rook, be more valuable than bishops)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rook, be more powerful than bishop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rook, be better than bishop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(rook, be more powerful than bishop)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rook, be better than bishop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rook, be more powerful than bishop)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rook, be more powerful than bishop)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rook, be better than bishop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rook, be more valuable than bishops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rook, be better than bishops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rook, be better than bishops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rook, be better than bishops)