rooster: attack people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, bird
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.53
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.37
, barn owl
Weight: 0.37
, cape buffalo
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack people 1.00
attack 0.94
attack humans 0.88
attack red 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rooster, attack people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pet, attack humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rooster, attack people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rooster, attack people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(rooster, attack)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(rooster, attack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rooster, attack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rooster, attack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rooster, attack red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rooster, attack red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rooster, attack red)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rooster, attack red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rooster, attack people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rooster, attack people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rooster, attack people)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)