rooster: be illegal in nyc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, bird
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.53
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.37
, barn owl
Weight: 0.37
, cape buffalo
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in nyc 1.00
be allowed in nyc 0.91
is illegal 0.79
be in miami 0.77
be allowed in new york 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(rooster, be in miami)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rooster, be in miami)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be in miami)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rooster, be in miami)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rooster, be illegal in nyc)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rooster, be illegal in nyc)