rooster: be in kitchens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, bird
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.53
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.37
, barn owl
Weight: 0.37
, cape buffalo
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in kitchens 1.00
be in kitchen lucky 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(rooster, be in kitchens)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rooster, be in kitchen lucky)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be in kitchen lucky)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rooster, be in kitchen lucky)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rooster, be in kitchen lucky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be in kitchens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rooster, be in kitchens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rooster, be in kitchens)