root canal: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
Siblings molar
Weight: 0.40
, water main
Weight: 0.33
, drain
Weight: 0.33
, water sport
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
have bad reputation 0.81
go bad 0.79
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drain, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(root canal, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(root canal, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(drain, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(root canal, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(root canal, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(root canal, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(root canal, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(root canal, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(root canal, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(root canal, have bad reputation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(root canal, have bad reputation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(root canal, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(root canal, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(root canal, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality jokes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(root canal, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality jokes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(root canal, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(root canal, has quality jokes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(root canal, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(root canal, has quality jokes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(root canal, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(root canal, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drain, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(root canal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)