rota: has quality wheels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.39
, place
Weight: 0.32
Siblings computer database
Weight: 0.26
, historical site
Weight: 0.26
, web
Weight: 0.26
, ssn
Weight: 0.26
, directory
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wheels 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rota, has quality wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rota, has quality wheels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(rota, has quality wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rota, has quality wheels)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)