rotor: be put on 2000 buick lasabre

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, electric motor
Weight: 0.51
, game
Weight: 0.50
, application
Weight: 0.50
Siblings caliper
Weight: 0.63
, stator
Weight: 0.55
, flagellum
Weight: 0.41
, valve
Weight: 0.33
, nozzle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be put on 2000 buick lasabre 1.00
be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre 0.93
be put 0.79
get on drivers side 2000 chevy blazer 0.78
get on drivers 2000 chevy blazer 0.77
be on car 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(caliper, be on car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(caliper, be on car)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(caliper, be on car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rotor, be on car)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rotor, be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rotor, be on car)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be on car)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rotor, be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rotor, be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rotor, be on car)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rotor, get on drivers side 2000 chevy blazer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rotor, get on drivers 2000 chevy blazer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(rotor, get on drivers side 2000 chevy blazer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(rotor, get on drivers 2000 chevy blazer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rotor, be put)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rotor, get on drivers side 2000 chevy blazer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(rotor, be put)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rotor, get on drivers side 2000 chevy blazer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rotor, get on drivers 2000 chevy blazer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rotor, get on drivers 2000 chevy blazer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rotor, be put)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on 2000 buick lasabre)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(caliper, be on car)