rotten food: be bad for person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, anything
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bad food
Weight: 0.37
, junk food
Weight: 0.35
, dog food
Weight: 0.35
, fresh food
Weight: 0.35
, chinese food
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for person 1.00
be bad for person to eat 0.94
be bad 0.92
be good 0.83
make person sick 0.80
wants to get some money from someone 0.77
go wrong 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rotten food, be bad for person)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(thing, go wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rotten food, be bad for person)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(anything, wants to get some money from someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rotten food, be bad for person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(problem, be bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(anything, wants to get some money from someone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(thing, go wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(problem, be bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, go wrong)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(anything, wants to get some money from someone)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(anything, wants to get some money from someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(thing, go wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fresh food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(rotten food, be bad for person)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, make person sick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rotten food, make person sick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rotten food, make person sick)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rotten food, make person sick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rotten food, be bad for person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(thing, go wrong)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(anything, wants to get some money from someone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fresh food, be good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(thing, go wrong)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rotten food, be bad for person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(anything, wants to get some money from someone)