rottweiler: be banned from apartments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, great dane
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, small dog
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned from apartments 1.00
is banned 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great dane, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be banned from apartments)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great dane, is banned)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is banned)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great dane, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, be banned from apartments)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(rottweiler, be banned from apartments)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is banned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rottweiler, is banned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is banned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be banned from apartments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be banned from apartments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great dane, is banned)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rottweiler, be banned from apartments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great dane, is banned)