rottweiler: has tail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, great dane
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, small dog
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has tail 1.00
have short tails 0.80
have clipped tails 0.79
have cut off tails 0.77
cut tails 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dog, has tail)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rottweiler, has tail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dog, has tail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dog, has tail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dog, has tail)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rottweiler, has tail)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cut off tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rottweiler, has tail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dog, has tail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dog, has tail)