roulette: be illegal in indian casinos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.59
, table
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.56
, song
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.52
Siblings blackjack
Weight: 0.54
, chess game
Weight: 0.34
, pinball
Weight: 0.33
, poker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in indian casinos 1.00
be illegal in casinos 0.94
is popular casino game 0.83
is casino game 0.83
is most popular casino game 0.82
be illegal in florida 0.77
be illegal in minnesota 0.76
is illegal 0.76
be illegal in california 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(poker, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pinball, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(blackjack, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(blackjack, is illegal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(poker, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poker, is illegal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pinball, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pinball, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in casinos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(roulette, is popular casino game)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(roulette, is popular casino game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(roulette, is most popular casino game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(roulette, is most popular casino game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(roulette, is popular casino game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(roulette, is most popular casino game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in casinos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(roulette, is casino game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(roulette, is popular casino game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(roulette, be illegal in casinos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(roulette, is casino game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(roulette, is casino game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(roulette, is most popular casino game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(roulette, is casino game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(roulette, be illegal in casinos)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in minnesota)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in minnesota)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in california)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roulette, is illegal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(roulette, be illegal in california)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(roulette, be illegal in california)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(roulette, be illegal in minnesota)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(roulette, be illegal in minnesota)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(roulette, is illegal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(roulette, is illegal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(roulette, be illegal in florida)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(roulette, be illegal in florida)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(roulette, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poker, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pinball, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(roulette, be illegal in indian casinos)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(blackjack, is illegal)