roundworm: be more complex than sponges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parasite
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, worm
Weight: 0.58
, disease
Weight: 0.51
, pathogen
Weight: 0.49
Siblings organism
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, plasmodium
Weight: 0.34
, protozoan
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex than sponges 1.00
be more complex than flatworms 0.84
be more complex than coelenterates 0.83
be more complex than segmentedworms 0.83
be more advanced than flatworms 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more complex than flatworms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more complex than segmentedworms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more complex than coelenterates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more advanced than flatworms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than flatworms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than segmentedworms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than coelenterates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(roundworm, be more complex than segmentedworms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than segmentedworms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(roundworm, be more advanced than flatworms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(roundworm, be more complex than coelenterates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than coelenterates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(roundworm, be more complex than flatworms)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than flatworms)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(roundworm, be more advanced than flatworms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, be more advanced than flatworms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(roundworm, be more complex than sponges)