roundworm: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parasite
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, worm
Weight: 0.58
, disease
Weight: 0.51
, pathogen
Weight: 0.49
Siblings organism
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, plasmodium
Weight: 0.34
, protozoan
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
is system important 0.86
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pathogen, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(worm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(roundworm, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(worm, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pathogen, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(worm, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pathogen, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(worm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(roundworm, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(roundworm, is system important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roundworm, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(roundworm, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(roundworm, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(roundworm, is system important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(roundworm, is system important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, is system important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(roundworm, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worm, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pathogen, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worm, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(roundworm, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pathogen, has quality bad)