router: be better than others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than others 1.00
work for other people 0.82
get worse 0.80
make less 0.79
work for people 0.77
get smaller 0.77
be more important than software 0.77
get paid less 0.76
be faster than software 0.76
be more expensive than features 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardware, be faster than software)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(software, get worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hardware, be faster than software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(software, get worse)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get smaller)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be faster than software)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be better than others)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(server, make less)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(server, get paid less)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hardware, be faster than software)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(router, be better than others)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(router, be better than others)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(router, be better than others)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(router, be better than others)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(motherboard, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(motherboard, be better than others)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(server, make less)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(server, make less)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(server, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(server, get paid less)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(router, be better than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, be better than others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hardware, be faster than software)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(motherboard, be better than others)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(server, get paid less)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(server, make less)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, be better than others)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hardware, be faster than software)