router: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
go 0.87
be bad today 0.85
go work 0.82
be got damn awful 0.81
get worse 0.80
be got awful 0.80
be got god damn awful 0.80
is terrible 0.79
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(router, go bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(router, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(software, get worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(software, get worse)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(modem, go bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(server, be bad today)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(server, go work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(router, go bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(software, get worse)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(router, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(server, go work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(server, go work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(modem, go bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(modem, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(motherboard, go bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(motherboard, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(server, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(server, be bad today)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(motherboard, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(motherboard, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(router, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(router, go)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(router, go)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(router, go)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(router, go)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(router, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(modem, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motherboard, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(server, go work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(server, be bad today)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(motherboard, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(software, get worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(router, go bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)