router: have two ip addresses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two ip addresses 1.00
need ip addresses 0.98
use ip addresses 0.98
handle 2 ip addresses 0.96
is ip address 0.96
need static ip addresses 0.95
use static ip addresses 0.95
route to remote ip addresses 0.91
have loopback ip 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(server, use static ip addresses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(server, need static ip addresses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(server, need static ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(server, need static ip addresses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(server, use static ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(server, use static ip addresses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(router, have two ip addresses)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(router, is ip address)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(router, is ip address)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(router, is ip address)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(router, handle 2 ip addresses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(router, handle 2 ip addresses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(router, handle 2 ip addresses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(router, handle 2 ip addresses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(router, route to remote ip addresses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(router, route to remote ip addresses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(router, is ip address)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(router, route to remote ip addresses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(router, route to remote ip addresses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(router, have two ip addresses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(server, need static ip addresses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(router, have two ip addresses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(server, use static ip addresses)