routine: be good for child

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.56
Siblings feeding
Weight: 0.60
, exercise
Weight: 0.32
, ritual
Weight: 0.32
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for child 1.00
be important for child 0.96
be important for children 0.86
be good for babies 0.85
be for babies important 0.81
be important for babies 0.81
be important for children 's development 0.80
be for babies 0.80
be important for toddlers 0.79
be important for infants 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(routine, be good for child)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(routine, be important for child)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(routine, be good for babies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(routine, be important for children)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(routine, be for babies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(routine, be important for babies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(routine, be for babies important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for child)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(routine, be important for infants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for child)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(routine, be good for babies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for children)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for children)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for babies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(routine, be for babies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for infants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for babies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(routine, be for babies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for infants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(routine, be for babies important)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(routine, be for babies important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(routine, be important for child)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(routine, be important for children)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(routine, be for babies)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(routine, be important for infants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(routine, be important for babies)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(routine, be for babies important)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(routine, be important for children 's development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(routine, be good for child)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(routine, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(routine, be good for child)