royalty: be contracts enforced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.58
, production
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.56
, fee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tax
Weight: 0.31
, rent
Weight: 0.31
, settlement
Weight: 0.30
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.30
, kickback
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be contracts enforced 1.00
be free contracts enforced 0.97
be contracts 0.88
be free contracts 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(royalty, be contracts enforced)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(royalty, be free contracts enforced)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(royalty, be free contracts enforced)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be free contracts enforced)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(royalty, be free contracts enforced)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(royalty, be contracts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(royalty, be free contracts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(royalty, be contracts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(royalty, be free contracts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(royalty, be contracts)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(royalty, be free contracts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be contracts)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be free contracts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be contracts enforced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(royalty, be contracts enforced)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(royalty, be contracts enforced)