royalty: be different from other payment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.58
, production
Weight: 0.58
, term
Weight: 0.56
, fee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tax
Weight: 0.31
, rent
Weight: 0.31
, settlement
Weight: 0.30
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.30
, kickback
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from other payment 1.00
were different from similar 0.78
pay for state government services 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay for state government services)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(settlement, were different from similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(settlement, were different from similar)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(settlement, were different from similar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tax, pay for state government services)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tax, pay for state government services)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(royalty, be different from other payment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be different from other payment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(royalty, be different from other payment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(settlement, were different from similar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(royalty, be different from other payment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tax, pay for state government services)