rubber duck: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.53
, item
Weight: 0.53
, toy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings rubber stamp
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, chicken leg
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have holes in them 0.89
have hole in bottom 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rubber duck, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, have holes in them)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rubber duck, have holes in them)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rubber duck, have holes in them)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rubber duck, have holes in them)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rubber duck, have hole in bottom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(rubber duck, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rubber duck, has physical part holes)